Teamscore für Team Christel Blum (1)

Team Christel Blum5,3714,63Team Klaus Schröder
Christel BlumLothar Tups11:23Klaus SchröderWolfgang Dombrowski
Catharina FürleArthur BehrendtKarin WeinitschkeHendrik Nanninga
Board 8−2,3W 1 +210−140W 1 +2D−1402,3
Board 91,3O 4 -15+1004N 4 -1A−504,0
Board 10−7,0S 3 -2A−2007W 4 -19+100−2,3
Board 11−10,7W 3SA +23−4607W 2SA +23−1804,0
Board 12−6,0N 2SA -1D−1006S 1SA +12+120−2,0
Board 13−1,0O 3SA -15+1003O 2SA -22+200−2,3
Board 146,7W 2 +28−1707W 4 +16−4502,7
Team Christel Blum7,4312,57Team Andreas Holowski
Christel BlumLothar Tups3:9Andreas HolowskiDr. Petra von Cube
Uta von SeckendorffDagmar LeiboldKarin WeinitschkeHendrik Nanninga
Board 15−1,3O 1SA =8−905S 1SA =2+90−5,0
Board 165,0W 2 X -18+2002N 3 +110+130−3,0
Board 170,3S 4 +19+4501N 4 =8+4201,0
Board 18−0,3W 3 +1D−1701W 3 =6−140−1,0
Board 19−3,0N 4 -2A−1002N 4 -1A−500,7
Board 20−1,3S 2SA =B+1201S 2SA +14+1500,3
Board 21−1,7N 1SA -13−100S 2 -18−1001,7
Team Christel Blum0,3219,68Team Kurt Lang
Christel BlumLothar Tups0:37Kurt LangAnna Katharina Meyer
Gerlinde JertzReinhard KleistKarin WeinitschkeHendrik Nanninga
Board 221,7W 5 -2B+200O 4 -24+200−1,7
Board 23−3,3W 1SA =K−907W 1SA -2A+200−6,0
Board 24−3,7N 2 +1B+1101N 1SA +26+1502,3
Board 25−1,0S 3SA +15+4301S 3SA +2B+460−0,3
Board 26−10,3W 4 =9−62013W 2SA -24+200−11,0
Board 27−1,3O 2 =B−905N 2 =A+90−5,0
Board 28−8,7O 4 =7−42010O 4 -110+50−5,3
Team Christel Blum1,4718,53Team Vera Waaga
Christel BlumLothar Tups6:35Vera WaagaMarian Mrukwa
Torsten WaagaUlrich BongartzKarin WeinitschkeHendrik Nanninga
Board 299,0O 4 -14+1006W 3 =6−140−2,7
Board 30−11,3W 4 +1D−45011W 4 -1K+50−2,3
Board 31−3,7O 2 +13−1405W 1SA -15+50−3,3
Board 32−3,0O 3SA -17+1003W 5 -28+200−1,0
Board 33−5,0O 2 +1A−1405O 4 -1K+50−1,7
Board 34−5,0O 3 +4K−1901O 2 +34−1504,0
Board 35−11,0O 3SA =4−60010O 2SA =8−120−0,7
Ergebnis: 5. Rang mit 14,59 SP / −84,0 IMP

Teamscore für Team Kurt Lang (2)

Team Kurt Lang3,9616,04Team Vera Waaga
Kurt LangAnna Katharina Meyer4:21Vera WaagaMarian Mrukwa
Torsten WaagaUlrich BongartzGerlinde JertzReinhard Kleist
Board 15−1,7S 1SA -12−100O 2 +1A−1102,0
Board 16−5,0S 3SA -25−1002S 2SA -15−503,0
Board 170,3S 4 +13+450S 4 +1K+450−0,3
Board 18−1,7S 5 X -1B−2002W 3 =2−140−1,0
Board 194,3N 2 =A+1104N 3 -1A−500,7
Board 20−8,0S 2SA -14−10012O 1SA X -2K+500−9,7
Board 21−1,7W 1 +15−1105O 2 -25+100−5,0
Team Kurt Lang19,680,32Team Christel Blum
Kurt LangAnna Katharina Meyer37:0Christel BlumLothar Tups
Karin WeinitschkeHendrik NanningaGerlinde JertzReinhard Kleist
Board 221,7O 4 -24+200W 5 -2B+200−1,7
Board 236,0W 1SA -2A+2007W 1SA =K−903,3
Board 24−2,3N 1SA +26+1501N 2 +1B+1103,7
Board 250,3S 3SA +2B+4601S 3SA +15+4301,0
Board 2611,0W 2SA -24+20013W 4 =9−62010,3
Board 275,0N 2 =A+905O 2 =B−901,3
Board 285,3O 4 -110+5010O 4 =7−4208,7
Team Kurt Lang12,947,06Team Klaus Schröder
Kurt LangAnna Katharina Meyer20:13Klaus SchröderWolfgang Dombrowski
Catharina FürleArthur BehrendtGerlinde JertzReinhard Kleist
Board 29−10,0O 4 =A−6208S 3 -310−3001,7
Board 306,7W 3SA -42+2004W 5 -1D+50−2,3
Board 31−3,0W 1SA +17−1205W 2SA -15+50−3,3
Board 321,0O 3SA -2K+200O 3SA -2K+200−1,0
Board 331,7O 4 -1A+50O 4 -1A+50−1,7
Board 3412,0O 3 X -3K+50012O 4 =B−1303,0
Board 357,3O 3 -1A+1004N 3 -1B−50−3,0
Team Kurt Lang3,0116,99Team Andreas Holowski
Kurt LangAnna Katharina Meyer8:29Andreas HolowskiDr. Petra von Cube
Uta von SeckendorffDagmar LeiboldGerlinde JertzReinhard Kleist
Board 1−11,0S 6SA -210−10011N 4 =5+420−4,0
Board 24,0O 2 =A−110O 2 =A−110−4,0
Board 30,7W 2 =A−1101S 3 -3A−1501,0
Board 4−5,7W 4 +23−6802W 4 =K−6203,7
Board 5−1,7O 2 +1D−1105O 3SA -29+100−5,0
Board 6−11,0S 3SA -25−10011S 3SA +15+430−4,0
Board 73,3N 1SA =4+907N 3SA -24−2006,0
Ergebnis: 3. Rang mit 39,59 SP / 6,0 IMP

Teamscore für Team Klaus Schröder (3)

Team Klaus Schröder4,7815,22Team Andreas Holowski
Klaus SchröderWolfgang Dombrowski7:21Andreas HolowskiDr. Petra von Cube
Uta von SeckendorffDagmar LeiboldCatharina FürleArthur Behrendt
Board 22−1,0S 3 =7+1401O 3 -1A+1002,3
Board 23−6,7N 2 -210−2008S 2 +1K+140−4,0
Board 24−2,3N 2 +1B+1408O 1SA X -33+500−8,3
Board 250,3S 3SA +22+460N 3SA +26+460−0,3
Board 26−2,3N 3 -3D−3004O 2 +2D−170−1,7
Board 27−2,3W 1SA +12−1201N 3 -2A−1001,3
Board 285,3O 4 -110+506O 2 +210−1702,0
Team Klaus Schröder7,0612,94Team Kurt Lang
Klaus SchröderWolfgang Dombrowski13:20Kurt LangAnna Katharina Meyer
Gerlinde JertzReinhard KleistCatharina FürleArthur Behrendt
Board 29−1,7S 3 -310−3008O 4 =A−62010,0
Board 302,3W 5 -1D+504W 3SA -42+200−6,7
Board 313,3W 2SA -15+505W 1SA +17−1203,0
Board 321,0O 3SA -2K+200O 3SA -2K+200−1,0
Board 331,7O 4 -1A+50O 4 -1A+50−1,7
Board 34−3,0O 4 =B−13012O 3 X -3K+500−12,0
Board 353,0N 3 -1B−504O 3 -1A+100−7,3
Team Klaus Schröder10,479,53Team Vera Waaga
Klaus SchröderWolfgang Dombrowski15:14Vera WaagaMarian Mrukwa
Torsten WaagaUlrich BongartzCatharina FürleArthur Behrendt
Board 13,0S 3SA =10+4001N 4 =8+420−4,0
Board 2−8,3N 4 X -2K−5007N 4 -2D−200−0,3
Board 31,3S 3 -2A−1002O 2SA +18−1501,0
Board 412,3O 6 -15+10012W 3SA =5−6003,0
Board 5−1,7O 1 +26−110O 2 +12−1101,7
Board 64,0S 3SA +15+4301S 3SA =6+400−3,0
Board 7−2,7N 3 -17−1006N 2 +18+140−5,3
Team Klaus Schröder14,635,37Team Christel Blum
Klaus SchröderWolfgang Dombrowski23:11Christel BlumLothar Tups
Karin WeinitschkeHendrik NanningaCatharina FürleArthur Behrendt
Board 8−2,3W 1 +2D−140W 1 +210−1402,3
Board 9−4,0N 4 -1A−504O 4 -15+100−1,3
Board 102,3W 4 -19+1007S 3 -2A−2007,0
Board 11−4,0W 2SA +23−1807W 3SA +23−46010,7
Board 122,0S 1SA +12+1206N 2SA -1D−1006,0
Board 132,3O 2SA -22+2003O 3SA -15+1001,0
Board 14−2,7W 4 +16−4507W 2 +28−170−6,7
Ergebnis: 4. Rang mit 36,94 SP / −8,0 IMP

Teamscore für Team Vera Waaga (4)

Team Vera Waaga18,531,47Team Christel Blum
Vera WaagaMarian Mrukwa35:6Christel BlumLothar Tups
Karin WeinitschkeHendrik NanningaTorsten WaagaUlrich Bongartz
Board 292,7W 3 =6−1406O 4 -14+100−9,0
Board 302,3W 4 -1K+5011W 4 +1D−45011,3
Board 313,3W 1SA -15+505O 2 +13−1403,7
Board 321,0W 5 -28+2003O 3SA -17+1003,0
Board 331,7O 4 -1K+505O 2 +1A−1405,0
Board 34−4,0O 2 +34−1501O 3 +4K−1905,0
Board 350,7O 2SA =8−12010O 3SA =4−60011,0
Team Vera Waaga9,5310,47Team Klaus Schröder
Vera WaagaMarian Mrukwa14:15Klaus SchröderWolfgang Dombrowski
Catharina FürleArthur BehrendtTorsten WaagaUlrich Bongartz
Board 14,0N 4 =8+4201S 3SA =10+400−3,0
Board 20,3N 4 -2D−2007N 4 X -2K−5008,3
Board 3−1,0O 2SA +18−1502S 3 -2A−100−1,3
Board 4−3,0W 3SA =5−60012O 6 -15+100−12,3
Board 5−1,7O 2 +12−110O 1 +26−1101,7
Board 63,0S 3SA =6+4001S 3SA +15+430−4,0
Board 75,3N 2 +18+1406N 3 -17−1002,7
Team Vera Waaga1,9918,01Team Andreas Holowski
Vera WaagaMarian Mrukwa0:26Andreas HolowskiDr. Petra von Cube
Uta von SeckendorffDagmar LeiboldTorsten WaagaUlrich Bongartz
Board 8−2,3W 1 +24−1407O 3SA -38+150−7,0
Board 91,3W 4 -1K+100O 5 -15+100−1,3
Board 102,3O 4 -19+100W 4 -19+100−2,3
Board 113,0O 4 -2D+1009N 4 X =K+510−11,7
Board 122,0N 1SA +1D+120N 2SA =D+120−2,0
Board 13−7,0O 1SA =K−909W 4 -310+300−5,7
Board 14−2,7W 4 +13−4501O 4 =2−4201,3
Team Vera Waaga16,043,96Team Kurt Lang
Vera WaagaMarian Mrukwa21:4Kurt LangAnna Katharina Meyer
Gerlinde JertzReinhard KleistTorsten WaagaUlrich Bongartz
Board 15−2,0O 2 +1A−110S 1SA -12−1001,7
Board 16−3,0S 2SA -15−502S 3SA -25−1005,0
Board 170,3S 4 +1K+450S 4 +13+450−0,3
Board 181,0W 3 =2−1402S 5 X -1B−2001,7
Board 19−0,7N 3 -1A−504N 2 =A+110−4,3
Board 209,7O 1SA X -2K+50012S 2SA -14−1008,0
Board 215,0O 2 -25+1005W 1 +15−1101,7
Ergebnis: 2. Rang mit 46,09 SP / 19,0 IMP

Teamscore für Team Andreas Holowski (5)

Team Andreas Holowski16,993,01Team Kurt Lang
Andreas HolowskiDr. Petra von Cube29:8Kurt LangAnna Katharina Meyer
Gerlinde JertzReinhard KleistUta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold
Board 14,0N 4 =5+42011S 6SA -210−10011,0
Board 24,0O 2 =A−110O 2 =A−110−4,0
Board 3−1,0S 3 -3A−1501W 2 =A−110−0,7
Board 4−3,7W 4 =K−6202W 4 +23−6805,7
Board 55,0O 3SA -29+1005O 2 +1D−1101,7
Board 64,0S 3SA +15+43011S 3SA -25−10011,0
Board 7−6,0N 3SA -24−2007N 1SA =4+90−3,3
Team Andreas Holowski18,011,99Team Vera Waaga
Andreas HolowskiDr. Petra von Cube26:0Vera WaagaMarian Mrukwa
Torsten WaagaUlrich BongartzUta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold
Board 87,0O 3SA -38+1507W 1 +24−1402,3
Board 91,3O 5 -15+100W 4 -1K+100−1,3
Board 102,3W 4 -19+100O 4 -19+100−2,3
Board 1111,7N 4 X =K+5109O 4 -2D+100−3,0
Board 122,0N 2SA =D+120N 1SA +1D+120−2,0
Board 135,7W 4 -310+3009O 1SA =K−907,0
Board 14−1,3O 4 =2−4201W 4 +13−4502,7
Team Andreas Holowski12,577,43Team Christel Blum
Andreas HolowskiDr. Petra von Cube9:3Christel BlumLothar Tups
Karin WeinitschkeHendrik NanningaUta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold
Board 155,0S 1SA =2+905O 1SA =8−901,3
Board 163,0N 3 +110+1302W 2 X -18+200−5,0
Board 17−1,0N 4 =8+4201S 4 +19+450−0,3
Board 181,0W 3 =6−1401W 3 +1D−1700,3
Board 19−0,7N 4 -1A−502N 4 -2A−1003,0
Board 20−0,3S 2SA +14+1501S 2SA =B+1201,3
Board 21−1,7S 2 -18−100N 1SA -13−1001,7
Team Andreas Holowski15,224,78Team Klaus Schröder
Andreas HolowskiDr. Petra von Cube21:7Klaus SchröderWolfgang Dombrowski
Catharina FürleArthur BehrendtUta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold
Board 22−2,3O 3 -1A+1001S 3 =7+1401,0
Board 234,0S 2 +1K+1408N 2 -210−2006,7
Board 248,3O 1SA X -33+5008N 2 +1B+1402,3
Board 250,3N 3SA +26+460S 3SA +22+460−0,3
Board 261,7O 2 +2D−1704N 3 -3D−3002,3
Board 27−1,3N 3 -2A−1001W 1SA +12−1202,3
Board 28−2,0O 2 +210−1706O 4 -110+50−5,3
Ergebnis: 1. Rang mit 62,79 SP / 67,0 IMP