Teamscore für Team Uta von Seckendorff (1)

Team Uta von Seckendorff12,947,06Team Anna Katharina Meyer
Uta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold19:12Anna Katharina MeyerAndrea Boldt
Heidi JaenschMartin BartholomewBrigitte RendchenWerner Olesch
Board 83,0O 4 -1D+50O 4 -1A+50−3,0
Board 92,0S 3 +16+1706S 4 -1B−504,0
Board 104,0S 1SA =3+905N 3SA -13−1002,0
Board 110,0W 2 -17+50W 2 -1A+500,0
Board 120,0O 3 =A−1402S 3 X -18−2002,0
Board 13−12,0O 4 =6−62012O 4 -17+100−2,0
Board 145,0S 1SA +16+1206W 3 =6−1403,0
Team Uta von Seckendorff3,4716,53Team Tomasz Gotard
Uta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold14:33Tomasz GotardAndreas Holowski
Dr. Petra von CubeGerdje ArlinghausBrigitte RendchenWerner Olesch
Board 151,0S 2 =2+1105N 3 -1K−1005,0
Board 161,0S 2 =2+1101S 1 +27+140−2,0
Board 17−7,0S 4 -1K−5010S 4 =A+420−5,0
Board 181,0W 2 -2K+1002O 2 -17+501,0
Board 196,0W 5 -17+1009W 6 X -24+500−12,0
Board 204,0S 3 +1K+1307W 1SA X =D−1804,0
Board 21−12,0W 6 +15−94013O 2SA =8−120−5,0
Team Uta von Seckendorff1,1518,85Team Barbara Gotard
Uta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold6:37Barbara GotardBernhard Sträter
Heidi SchürmannStefan BenkwitzBrigitte RendchenWerner Olesch
Board 22−2,0O 3 +18−1703N 3 -1A−50−2,0
Board 23−4,0W 1SA =2−905S 1 =A+80−1,0
Board 24−4,0W 5 -1A+504N 3 +2A+2000,0
Board 25−7,0O 4 =B−620O 4 =B−6207,0
Board 264,0S 3 =A+1406S 3 -1A−1003,0
Board 27−9,0W 6 +15−101014W 3SA -14+50−12,0
Board 28−7,0W 4 +2K−48011W 4 -28+100−7,0
Team Uta von Seckendorff5,0714,93Team Dr. Bernd von Cube
Uta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold13:26Dr. Bernd von CubeBernd Wagemann
Gabi SchneiderAlfried BockerBrigitte RendchenWerner Olesch
Board 299,0W 6 -1D+10012O 3SA =10−6007,0
Board 30−4,0S 4 -2K−1002S 4 -12−503,0
Board 31−9,0N 4 -18−10013N 4 +2B+680−9,0
Board 32−4,0O 3SA +37−69011N 2 -24−100−10,0
Board 33−2,0W 3 =8−140W 3 =7−1402,0
Board 342,0S 2 +16+1101S 2 =4+90−1,0
Board 35−6,0O 2 +16−140S 2 -3B−1506,0
Ergebnis: 4. Rang mit 22,63 SP / −56,0 IMP

Teamscore für Team Barbara Gotard (2)

Team Barbara Gotard3,9616,04Team Dr. Bernd von Cube
Barbara GotardBernhard Sträter5:22Dr. Bernd von CubeBernd Wagemann
Gabi SchneiderAlfried BockerHeidi SchürmannStefan Benkwitz
Board 152,0S 2 +1A+1401S 2 =A+110−1,0
Board 161,0S 2 +13+1104S 3SA -17−504,0
Board 17−2,0S 3 +2A+2006S 4 =A+420−5,0
Board 18−1,0O 2 -1A+502O 2 -2K+100−1,0
Board 19−10,0W 4 =4−620W 4 =5−62010,0
Board 20−5,0S 3SA -210−2008S 4 =5+130−4,0
Board 213,0N 2 -2A−2006O 2SA -19+50−8,0
Team Barbara Gotard18,851,15Team Uta von Seckendorff
Barbara GotardBernhard Sträter37:6Uta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold
Brigitte RendchenWerner OleschHeidi SchürmannStefan Benkwitz
Board 222,0N 3 -1A−503O 3 +18−1702,0
Board 231,0S 1 =A+805W 1SA =2−904,0
Board 240,0N 3 +2A+2004W 5 -1A+504,0
Board 25−7,0O 4 =B−620O 4 =B−6207,0
Board 26−3,0S 3 -1A−1006S 3 =A+140−4,0
Board 2712,0W 3SA -14+5014W 6 +15−10109,0
Board 287,0W 4 -28+10011W 4 +2K−4807,0
Team Barbara Gotard17,212,79Team Anna Katharina Meyer
Barbara GotardBernhard Sträter37:15Anna Katharina MeyerAndrea Boldt
Heidi JaenschMartin BartholomewHeidi SchürmannStefan Benkwitz
Board 295,0N 2 -1D−10011O 3SA +18−6308,0
Board 30−3,0S 4 -12−5010S 4 =2+420−8,0
Board 315,0O 5 X -3A+5008N 3 =4+1405,0
Board 32−3,0O 3SA +23−6604N 4 X -44−8006,0
Board 33−2,0W 3 =8−1405W 3 -18+50−4,0
Board 341,0S 2 =4+905S 2 -12−1004,0
Board 359,0O 3 X -2A+5009O 3 -16+100−1,0
Team Barbara Gotard7,4312,57Team Tomasz Gotard
Barbara GotardBernhard Sträter3:9Tomasz GotardAndreas Holowski
Dr. Petra von CubeGerdje ArlinghausHeidi SchürmannStefan Benkwitz
Board 11,0N 3 -1K−501O 1SA =5−900,0
Board 23,0O 5 -1A+502S 2 =5+110−4,0
Board 3−3,0S 4 -310−1503S 4 -14−500,0
Board 42,0W 1SA =2−902W 1SA +22−1500,0
Board 5−3,0O 1 +19−1104O 2 -19+50−1,0
Board 6−3,0O 3 +1A−130O 3 +1A−1303,0
Board 75,0N 4 =K+620N 4 =K+620−5,0
Ergebnis: 3. Rang mit 47,45 SP / 30,0 IMP

Teamscore für Team Anna Katharina Meyer (3)

Team Anna Katharina Meyer020Team Tomasz Gotard
Anna Katharina MeyerAndrea Boldt0:43Tomasz GotardAndreas Holowski
Dr. Petra von CubeGerdje ArlinghausHeidi JaenschMartin Bartholomew
Board 22−2,0O 3 +1A−1703N 3 -1A−50−2,0
Board 232,0S 1SA =6+90S 1 =4+80−1,0
Board 24−1,0N 3 +1A+1706N 4 =A+420−5,0
Board 255,0S 4 -3A−1506O 4 -1B+100−9,0
Board 26−5,0W 3 +1A−1707N 3 =8+140−4,0
Board 27−8,0W 6 +13−94010W 4 +14−450−4,0
Board 28−7,0W 4 +22−48011W 3 -2K+100−7,0
Team Anna Katharina Meyer2,7917,21Team Barbara Gotard
Anna Katharina MeyerAndrea Boldt15:37Barbara GotardBernhard Sträter
Heidi SchürmannStefan BenkwitzHeidi JaenschMartin Bartholomew
Board 29−8,0O 3SA +18−63011N 2 -1D−100−5,0
Board 308,0S 4 =2+42010S 4 -12−503,0
Board 31−5,0N 3 =4+1408O 5 X -3A+500−5,0
Board 32−6,0N 4 X -44−8004O 3SA +23−6603,0
Board 334,0W 3 -18+505W 3 =8−1402,0
Board 34−4,0S 2 -12−1005S 2 =4+90−1,0
Board 351,0O 3 -16+1009O 3 X -2A+500−9,0
Team Anna Katharina Meyer1,1518,85Team Dr. Bernd von Cube
Anna Katharina MeyerAndrea Boldt1:32Dr. Bernd von CubeBernd Wagemann
Gabi SchneiderAlfried BockerHeidi JaenschMartin Bartholomew
Board 10,0O 1SA =5−90O 1SA =5−900,0
Board 2−3,0W 1SA +24−1501W 1SA +35−1804,0
Board 3−3,0S 4 -3K−1508S 3 +2K+200−6,0
Board 4−1,0O 2 +27−1701W 1SA +22−1500,0
Board 51,0O 2 -110+50O 2 -110+50−1,0
Board 6−3,0O 3 +1A−13010O 3SA -3A+300−8,0
Board 7−11,0O 3 +1K−17013N 4 =K+620−5,0
Team Anna Katharina Meyer7,0612,94Team Uta von Seckendorff
Anna Katharina MeyerAndrea Boldt12:19Uta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold
Brigitte RendchenWerner OleschHeidi JaenschMartin Bartholomew
Board 83,0O 4 -1A+50O 4 -1D+50−3,0
Board 9−4,0S 4 -1B−506S 3 +16+170−2,0
Board 10−2,0N 3SA -13−1005S 1SA =3+90−4,0
Board 110,0W 2 -1A+50W 2 -17+500,0
Board 12−2,0S 3 X -18−2002O 3 =A−1400,0
Board 132,0O 4 -17+10012O 4 =6−62012,0
Board 14−3,0W 3 =6−1406S 1SA +16+120−5,0
Ergebnis: 5. Rang mit 11,00 SP / −103,0 IMP

Teamscore für Team Dr. Bernd von Cube (4)

Team Dr. Bernd von Cube14,935,07Team Uta von Seckendorff
Dr. Bernd von CubeBernd Wagemann26:13Uta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold
Brigitte RendchenWerner OleschGabi SchneiderAlfried Bocker
Board 29−7,0O 3SA =10−60012W 6 -1D+100−9,0
Board 30−3,0S 4 -12−502S 4 -2K−1004,0
Board 319,0N 4 +2B+68013N 4 -18−1009,0
Board 3210,0N 2 -24−10011O 3SA +37−6904,0
Board 33−2,0W 3 =7−140W 3 =8−1402,0
Board 341,0S 2 =4+901S 2 +16+110−2,0
Board 35−6,0S 2 -3B−150O 2 +16−1406,0
Team Dr. Bernd von Cube18,851,15Team Anna Katharina Meyer
Dr. Bernd von CubeBernd Wagemann32:1Anna Katharina MeyerAndrea Boldt
Heidi JaenschMartin BartholomewGabi SchneiderAlfried Bocker
Board 10,0O 1SA =5−90O 1SA =5−900,0
Board 2−4,0W 1SA +35−1801W 1SA +24−1503,0
Board 36,0S 3 +2K+2008S 4 -3K−1503,0
Board 40,0W 1SA +22−1501O 2 +27−1701,0
Board 51,0O 2 -110+50O 2 -110+50−1,0
Board 68,0O 3SA -3A+30010O 3 +1A−1303,0
Board 75,0N 4 =K+62013O 3 +1K−17011,0
Team Dr. Bernd von Cube3,9616,04Team Tomasz Gotard
Dr. Bernd von CubeBernd Wagemann2:19Tomasz GotardAndreas Holowski
Dr. Petra von CubeGerdje ArlinghausGabi SchneiderAlfried Bocker
Board 8−3,0O 2 +16−140O 2 +1A−1403,0
Board 9−6,0N 3SA -3K−15012S 4 +2B+480−9,0
Board 10−2,0N 3SA -13−100S 3SA -13−1002,0
Board 110,0W 1SA -17+50W 1SA -17+500,0
Board 121,0S 3 -13−100O 1 +14−110−1,0
Board 134,0O 5 -27+2007O 4 X -2B+500−10,0
Board 140,0S 2SA -16−502W 2 =D−1102,0
Team Dr. Bernd von Cube16,043,96Team Barbara Gotard
Dr. Bernd von CubeBernd Wagemann22:5Barbara GotardBernhard Sträter
Heidi SchürmannStefan BenkwitzGabi SchneiderAlfried Bocker
Board 151,0S 2 =A+1101S 2 +1A+140−2,0
Board 16−4,0S 3SA -17−504S 2 +13+110−1,0
Board 175,0S 4 =A+4206S 3 +2A+2002,0
Board 181,0O 2 -2K+1002O 2 -1A+501,0
Board 19−10,0W 4 =5−620W 4 =4−62010,0
Board 204,0S 4 =5+1308S 3SA -210−2005,0
Board 218,0O 2SA -19+506N 2 -2A−200−3,0
Ergebnis: 2. Rang mit 53,78 SP / 44,0 IMP

Teamscore für Team Tomasz Gotard (5)

Team Tomasz Gotard12,577,43Team Barbara Gotard
Tomasz GotardAndreas Holowski9:3Barbara GotardBernhard Sträter
Heidi SchürmannStefan BenkwitzDr. Petra von CubeGerdje Arlinghaus
Board 10,0O 1SA =5−901N 3 -1K−50−1,0
Board 24,0S 2 =5+1102O 5 -1A+50−3,0
Board 30,0S 4 -14−503S 4 -310−1503,0
Board 40,0W 1SA +22−1502W 1SA =2−90−2,0
Board 51,0O 2 -19+504O 1 +19−1103,0
Board 6−3,0O 3 +1A−130O 3 +1A−1303,0
Board 75,0N 4 =K+620N 4 =K+620−5,0
Team Tomasz Gotard16,043,96Team Dr. Bernd von Cube
Tomasz GotardAndreas Holowski19:2Dr. Bernd von CubeBernd Wagemann
Gabi SchneiderAlfried BockerDr. Petra von CubeGerdje Arlinghaus
Board 8−3,0O 2 +1A−140O 2 +16−1403,0
Board 99,0S 4 +2B+48012N 3SA -3K−1506,0
Board 10−2,0S 3SA -13−100N 3SA -13−1002,0
Board 110,0W 1SA -17+50W 1SA -17+500,0
Board 121,0O 1 +14−110S 3 -13−100−1,0
Board 1310,0O 4 X -2B+5007O 5 -27+200−4,0
Board 14−2,0W 2 =D−1102S 2SA -16−500,0
Team Tomasz Gotard16,533,47Team Uta von Seckendorff
Tomasz GotardAndreas Holowski33:14Uta von SeckendorffDagmar Leibold
Brigitte RendchenWerner OleschDr. Petra von CubeGerdje Arlinghaus
Board 15−5,0N 3 -1K−1005S 2 =2+110−1,0
Board 162,0S 1 +27+1401S 2 =2+110−1,0
Board 175,0S 4 =A+42010S 4 -1K−507,0
Board 18−1,0O 2 -17+502W 2 -2K+100−1,0
Board 1912,0W 6 X -24+5009W 5 -17+100−6,0
Board 20−4,0W 1SA X =D−1807S 3 +1K+130−4,0
Board 215,0O 2SA =8−12013W 6 +15−94012,0
Team Tomasz Gotard200Team Anna Katharina Meyer
Tomasz GotardAndreas Holowski43:0Anna Katharina MeyerAndrea Boldt
Heidi JaenschMartin BartholomewDr. Petra von CubeGerdje Arlinghaus
Board 222,0N 3 -1A−503O 3 +1A−1702,0
Board 231,0S 1 =4+80S 1SA =6+90−2,0
Board 245,0N 4 =A+4206N 3 +1A+1701,0
Board 259,0O 4 -1B+1006S 4 -3A−150−5,0
Board 264,0N 3 =8+1407W 3 +1A−1705,0
Board 274,0W 4 +14−45010W 6 +13−9408,0
Board 287,0W 3 -2K+10011W 4 +22−4807,0
Ergebnis: 1. Rang mit 65,14 SP / 85,0 IMP